Emily R. Langdon
402.978.5386elangdon@fraserstryker.com email Emily
This article is co-authored by Emily Langdon, Partner at Fraser Stryker PC LLO, and Jacob Bosacki, Senior Consultant at Mullin Barens Sanford Financial.
During April 2021, amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of employees who quit their jobs in just one month broke a previously unsurpassed record in the United States. Economists call this “The Great Resignation.” April was only the beginning of this so-called “Great Resignation”. In July, even more employees quit. Yet again, the number of “quits” – the term coined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics – reached new record highs in August and again in November, and there is no expectation of a reversal in the near term. In fact, “[n]early a quarter of workers plan a job change or retirement in the next 12–18 months, and 81% of plan sponsors are concerned about increased competition for talent.”[1]
With a tightening labor market, employers are feeling the squeeze at all aptitude levels, especially in their battle to retain executive leadership and attract new executives. The question employers are left with is how to combat a workforce terminating voluntarily – with a tight labor-market, with supply-chain issues, and with a pandemic? An immediate tool: provide a DCP specifically designed to overcome recruitment and retention challenges. What is a DCP?
In this context, a DCP is an agreement between or among an employer and one or more employees that permits an employee to delay receipt of compensation to a later year (e.g., short-term [2-10 years] or long-term [retirement]). The plan also permits the employer to make discretionary contributions to an employee’s account and dictate vesting requirements for these contributions (e.g., recruitment bonus with three-year cliff vesting). There are no statutory limitations on the amount a participant can defer, or an employer can contribute.[2] Participants are typically given the ability to direct which investments their deferrals or vested employer contributions track. The investment menu is created by the employer. Typically, a recordkeeper tracks and credits participant investment returns to their respective accounts daily.
Like qualified plans, DCPs are primarily used because of the tax preference received through the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”). Under a properly structured plan, employer contributions and employee deferrals are made tax-deferred.[3] Tax is also deferred on investment yield and investment reallocation[4] – resulting in a tax-preferred investment environment. Income tax is typically recognized when distributions are received by the participant.[5]
Permissible distributions from DCPs generally occur at separation from service, a specified date (including in-service), as a result of a change in control, the death or disability of a participant, or in the event of an unforeseeable emergency.[6] These distributions can be made as a lump sum or can be scheduled to occur as installments spanning several years.[7] There are no required minimum distributions or penalty for receiving distributions before age 59½.[8]
Rules governing DCPs require discrimination in favor of a select group of management or highly compensated employees.[9] As long as the plan is “a plan which is unfunded and is maintained by an employer primarily for the purpose of providing deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees”, the plan is exempt from ERISA’s minimum participation and vesting rules, its funding rules, and its fiduciary responsibility rules (including the trust requirement).[10]
DCPs are a mechanism employers use to strategically meet compensation and benefits issues faced by their more highly compensated employee pool. These plans can and should be designed to meet the challenges created by changing economic and social issues. For example, “The Great Resignation” has created issues for employers seeking to recruit or retain top-level talent – and a properly designed DCP can meet these challenges regardless of how fluid the challenges are.
Pre-tax retirement savings capacity is a critical component of the American retirement system. Without pre-tax deferral capacity, a key employee’s ability to accumulate assets for retirement is significantly damaged. The most common pre-tax savings plan in America is the 401(k) plan. A 401(k) plan exists to provide most employees with tax incentives to save for their own retirement. Unfortunately, the amount of compensation deferrable under a 401(k) plan is extremely limited by Code section 402(g) – $20,500 in 2022. The deferral limit is often further reduced for highly compensated employees when the ADP and ACP nondiscrimination tests are applied.
Layering a basic DCP into a highly compensated employee’s benefits may fully restore the deferral capacity the employee may have lost by virtue of being a key employee. Generally, a DCP is the only plan that provides high earners the ability to invest compensation in an unlimited amount on a tax-deferred basis. For that reason, DCPs are commonly used as a foundation of executive retirement programs, and when used as such, are an extremely powerful accumulation tool.
There is limited ability for highly compensated employees to provide themselves with a meaningful tax-deferred retirement investment platform outside of an employer-sponsored DCP. Non-highly compensated employees can defer a large percentage of their compensation under a 401(k) plan and have additional options outside of an employer-sponsored plan – such as using an IRA to make pre-tax or tax-deferred contributions. Not providing a basic DCP to highly compensated employees put those employees and the employer at an unnecessary disadvantage.
While it is clear that the American workforce is in a state of tremendous transition, it is also very clear that a primary factor driving those changes is that individuals do want to work for employers who can meet their needs. A company deploying strategic benefits packages is more capable of meeting the needs of individual executive employees.
The process of designing or assessing a DCP begins with the assistance of an experienced DCP consultant. By combining the skill of a DCP expert with the knowledge of an ERISA attorney, a plan sponsor can collaborate with an experienced team to successfully establish or amend a DCP to meet its corporate goals and needs – both short-term and long-term.
[1] Survey results show workers looking at changes, less confident in economy. Principal Financial Group. November 9, 2021.
[2] IRC Section 409A.
[3] Id.
[4] 26 CFR § 31.3121(v)(2)-1.
[5] Id.
[6] 26 USC Section 409A(a)(2)(A).
[7] See, e.g., 26 CFR Section 1.409A-3(b).
[8] 26 USC Section 72(t)(2)(A)(i).
[9] Sections 201, 301(a)(3), and 401(a)(1) of ERISA.
[10] Id.
This article has been prepared for general information purposes and (1) does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship, (2) is not intended as a solicitation, (3) is not intended to convey or constitute legal advice, and (4) is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney. Always seek professional counsel prior to taking action.
Who We Service